|
|
Cooperative Extension Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agricultural
Experiment Station |
|
|
|
|
|
4-H Programs
Division Home |
Why Evaluate?Welcome to the Life Skills Evaluation website. This website was adapted by Arkansas 4-H to assist 4-H Youth Development faculty and staff to evaluate their programs that teach life skills. Why Participate In The Life Skills Evaluation?Evaluation data are needed at the local and state level to provide information to funders and decision-makers about the impacts our programs have on youth and adult participants. This process will allow for both local and statewide data to be aggregated and used in a variety of reports. What Can This Evaluation System Do For You?This evaluation system was created to measure growth in specific life skills as a result of individuals' participation in a program. The information gathered will tell you 1) if the program was effective in meeting its life skill objective and 2) provide concrete evidence to stakeholders concerning program effects. This is not a subject-matter assessment tool. It is not designed to measure growth in content (i.e., knowledge of nutritional information or computer technology). However, a section on content can be added by the evaluator (select Learning to Use the System). Basics Of Program EvaluationsProgram evaluation is the systematic collection of information to be used in assessing program components in order to make decisions about the program (Jacobs, 1988; Patton, 1997). There are two general types of evaluation:
Results of program evaluations are used for one or more of the following purposes (Patton, 1997):
Plans for the evaluation of a program should occur from the very start of a program, during the program planning stage (Jacobs, 1988). The evaluation then becomes integrated into the everyday activities of the program. The purpose of the evaluation should be tied to the developmental stage of the program. Jacobs (1988) developed the Five-Tiered Approach to Evaluation, suggesting that evaluation of new programs focus on the process of accountability and improvement while the evaluation of established programs move toward a level of assessing outcomes or impact. According to the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994), quality evaluations have four characteristics which need to be kept in mind when planning an evaluation. These characteristics are:
|
|
© 2008 |
|
|
University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture |
Mission
•
Disclaimer
•
EEO
•
|